Violent Revolution in Response to Political Oppression
This essay analyzes the 2019 Lincoln-Douglas Debate Final Round on violent revolution as a response to political oppression. Nehal Chigurupati supports violent resistance to address systemic injustice, while Grace Johannes advocates for nonviolent alternatives, emphasizing the risks and moral costs of violence. Both speakers present compelling arguments, but Grace’s emphasis on human rights and sustainable justice offers a more persuasive stance against violent revolution.
References
National Speech & Debate Association (2018). Nationals 2019 – Lincoln-Douglas Debate Final Round . YouTube. Web.
Reference
StudyCorgi. (2025, June 24). Violent Revolution in Response to Political Oppression. https://studycorgi.video/violent-revolution-in-response-to-political-oppression/