John Locke’s Tabula Rasa vs. Innatism
This paper explores the philosophical debate between John Locke’s theory of tabula rasa and the concept of innatism, supported by thinkers like Descartes and Chomsky. It argues in favor of Locke’s view that individuals are born as blank slates, emphasizing the importance of experience, education, and free will in shaping human behavior. The paper uses personal experience to highlight how societal expectations based on presumed innate traits can limit growth and self-discovery. Ultimately, the tabula rasa theory is preferred for its support of autonomy, fair decision-making, and the rejection of inherited limitations.
References
Rekret, P. (2018). The posthumanist tabula rasa. Research in Education, 101(1), 25-29. Web.
Reference
StudyCorgi. (2025, April 7). John Locke’s Tabula Rasa vs. Innatism. https://studycorgi.video/john-lockes-tabula-rasa-vs-innatism/