Euthanasia Definition, Types, Pros and Cons
This essay explores the ethical, legal, and medical debates surrounding euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. It examines the definitions, forms, and arguments both for and against the practices. While some advocate for individual autonomy and resource efficiency, others raise moral, religious, and ethical concerns. The paper highlights the importance of balancing patient rights with physicians’ responsibilities and calls for collaboration between healthcare and legal systems to define appropriate limits for life-ending decisions.
References
Biggs, H. (2001). Euthanasia, death with dignity, and the law. Oxford: Hart Publ..
Cavan, S. (2000). Euthanasia: the debate over the right to die. New York: Rosen Pub.Group.
Dracobly, A. (2005). A merciful end: The euthanasia movement in modern America; ‘Merciful release’: The history of the British euthanasia movement. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 41(3), 287-289.
Healey, J. (2002). The euthanasia debate. Rozelle, N.S.W.: Spinney Press.
Smith, S. W. (2007). Empirical research in the debate on physician-assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia. Clinical Ethics, 2(3), 129-132.
Reference
StudyCorgi. (2025, June 30). Euthanasia Definition, Types, Pros and Cons. https://studycorgi.video/euthanasia-definition-types-pros-and-cons/