A Comparison of Narrative and Phenomenological Designs
Phenomenological and narrative research methods both explore human experiences but differ in focus and purpose. Phenomenology emphasizes describing the essence of phenomena, aiming to uncover shared experiences without bias. Narrative methods, however, prioritize interpreting individual stories to understand how people make sense of reality. Despite similar data collection techniques, such as interviews, their distinct approaches yield different insights. Both methods are effective for studying complex experiences, like gaming addiction, offering unique perspectives on “gaming highs.”
References
Bruce, A., Beuthin, R., Sheilds, L., Molzahn, A., & Schick-Makaroff, K. (2016). Narrative research evolving: Evolving through narrative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), 1609406916659292.
Feldman, M. S., Sköldberg, K., Brown, R. N., & Horner, D. (2004). Making sense of stories: A rhetorical approach to narrative analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 147-170.
Giorgi, A. (2010). Phenomenological psychology: A brief history and its challenges. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 41(2), 145-179.
Gong, X., Zhang, K. Z., Cheung, C. M., Chen, C., & Lee, M. K. (2019). Alone or together? Exploring the role of desire for online group gaming in players’ social game addiction. Information & Management, 56(6), 1-12.
Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 42-55.
Reference
StudyCorgi. (2025, January 13). A Comparison of Narrative and Phenomenological Designs. https://studycorgi.video/a-comparison-of-narrative-and-phenomenological-designs/